Can and “should” Qualitative Research Be ValueFree? Understanding the Epistemological Tussle between Positivists and Interpretivists1

Authors

  • Dr. Dayyab Gillani Assistant Professor Department of Political Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore. Author

Keywords:

Value-free, qualitative research, objectivity, social sciences, ontology, epistemology, constructivism, interpretivism, ethical considerations, subjectivity

Abstract

This paper seeks to address the question of value-free research in qualitative methods. The primary argument of the paper is that qualitative research is not value-free because it is not intended to be as such. It analyzes this question by tracing the roots of qualitative research at the ontological and epistemological level. It argues that qualitative research tradition has evolved out of constructivism and interpretivism both of which prioritize people’s interpretation and discount objectivity in social science research. Furthermore, the paper argues that social science research cannot be value-free because of strong ethical considerations. All the cases presented in the paper will fundamentally try to show that all qualitative research is essentially subjective not just because of the impediments but because it is not designed to be value-free. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/u574922478/domains/jps.pu.edu.pk/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.php on line 68

How to Cite

Can and “should” Qualitative Research Be ValueFree? Understanding the Epistemological Tussle between Positivists and Interpretivists1. (2021). Journal of Political Studies, 28(01), 181-192. https://jps.pu.edu.pk/6/article/view/566

Similar Articles

21-30 of 231

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.